Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercises on Stress, Pain Perception, and Functional Mobility in Chronic Low Back Pain
Keywords:
chronic low back pain, diaphragmatic breathing, perceived stress, functional mobility, randomized controlled trialAbstract
Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is perpetuated by elevated stress, maladaptive breathing patterns, and reduced functional mobility; however, the independent efficacy of diaphragmatic breathing exercises remains insufficiently examined in outpatient settings. Objective: To determine the effect of a 6-week diaphragmatic breathing exercise program on pain, perceived stress, and functional mobility in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain compared with routine care. Methods: Assessor-blinded, two-arm randomized controlled trial conducted in physiotherapy outpatient departments in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Seventy adults with CLBP ≥12 weeks were randomized to breathing exercises (twice-weekly supervised plus daily home practice) or control (routine advice). Primary outcome was pain intensity (VAS 0–10); secondary outcomes included perceived stress (PSS-10), Timed Up and Go test, respiratory rate, lumbar flexion ROM, and sleep quality, assessed at baseline and 6 weeks. Between-group differences were analyzed using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values. Results: The breathing group achieved significantly greater reductions in pain (−2.8 vs −0.5 VAS points; mean difference −2.3, 95% CI −2.9 to −1.7), perceived stress (−7.2 vs −1.2 PSS points; mean difference −6.0, 95% CI −8.1 to −3.9), and TUG time (−2.8 vs −0.6 s; p < 0.001 for all). Allocation to breathing exercises independently predicted lower post-treatment stress (β = −5.68, p < 0.001). Conclusion: A structured 6-week diaphragmatic breathing program is an effective, lowcost adjunct therapy for reducing pain, stress, and functional limitations in chronic low back pain.
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Junaid Alvi, Zeeshan Ali, Sara Mubeen (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright is retained by the Author(s). Published in JPMHR under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Unrestricted reuse is permitted with proper attribution to the author(s) and source.