Physician Readiness for Pharmacogenomics and Genomic-Guided Prescribing: A Cross-Sectional Study at Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Authors

  • Bint-e-Kulsoom GC University, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author
  • Amir Nazir GC University, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author

Keywords:

shared decision-making; decision aids; cardiovascular risk; primary prevention; randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) enables genotype-guided prescribing to improve drug safety and efficacy; however, implementation in low- and middle-income countries remains limited. Physician readiness—encompassing knowledge, attitudes, competence, practice behavior, and perceived barriers—is critical for clinical integration. Objective: To evaluate PGx knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, practice patterns, barriers, and predictors of readiness among physicians affiliated with Government College University (GCU), Faisalabad, Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 137 physicians was conducted using a structured instrument assessing objective knowledge (0–15), attitudes (1–5), self-efficacy (1–5), practice index (0–6), barrier score (1–5), and composite readiness (0–100). “Ready” was defined as ≥65. Associations were examined using t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression with adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Mean readiness was 61.2±12.8, with 32.1% classified as ready. Formal PGx training (23.4% prevalence) was associated with higher knowledge (10.8±2.0 vs 8.1±2.3; p<0.001; g=1.20) and readiness (72.0±10.0 vs 58.0±12.0; p<0.001). Training independently predicted readiness (OR=3.6; 95% CI 1.5–8.7; p=0.004), as did knowledge of local ordering pathways (OR=4.2; 95% CI 1.8–10.0; p=0.001), while higher barrier scores reduced readiness (OR=0.55 per unit increase; p=0.009). Conclusion: Physician readiness for PGx at GCU Faisalabad is moderate but suboptimal; structured education and system-level infrastructure are essential to translate favorable attitudes into genomic-guided prescribing.

References

1. Relling MV, Evans WE. Pharmacogenomics in the clinic. Nature. 2015;526(7573):343–350.

2. Caudle KE, Klein TE, Hoffman JM, Muller DJ, Whirl-Carrillo M, Gong L, et al. Incorporation of pharmacogenomics into routine clinical practice: the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline development process. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95(4):376–382.

3. Crews KR, Hicks JK, Pui CH, Relling MV, Evans WE. Pharmacogenomics and individualized medicine: translating science into practice. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(2):321–326.

4. Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):793–795.

5. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):15–19.

6. Hicks JK, Dunnenberger HM, Gumpper KF, Haidar CE, Hoffman JM. Integrating pharmacogenomics into electronic health records with clinical decision support. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;97(5):510–520.

7. Dunnenberger HM, Crews KR, Hoffman JM, Caudle KE, Broeckel U, Howard SC, et al. Preemptive clinical pharmacogenetics implementation: current programs in five US medical centers. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014;166C(1):79–88.

8. Whirl-Carrillo M, McDonagh EM, Hebert JM, Gong L, Sangkuhl K, Thorn CF, et al. Pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;92(4):414–417.

9. Haga SB, Burke W, Agans R. Primary-care physicians’ access to genetic specialists: an impediment to the routine use of pharmacogenetic testing? Genet Med. 2012;14(10):872–879.

10. Stanek EJ, Sanders CL, Taber KA, Khalid M, Patel A, Verbrugge RR, et al. Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012;69(18):1539–1545.

11. Luzum JA, Pakyz RE, Elsey AR, Haidar CE, Peterson JF, Whirl-Carrillo M, et al. The pharmacogenomics research network translational pharmacogenetics program: outcomes and metrics of pharmacogenetic implementation across diverse healthcare systems. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101(2):185–192.

12. O’Donnell PH, Danahey K, Jacobs M, Wadhwa NR, Yuen S, Bush A, et al. Adoption of a clinical pharmacogenomics implementation program during outpatient care—initial results of the University of Chicago “1200 Patients Project”. Genet Med. 2019;21(7):159–169.

13. Schildcrout JS, Denny JC, Bowton E, Gregg W, Pulley JM, Basford MA, et al. Optimizing drug outcomes through pharmacogenetics: a case for preemptive genotyping. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;92(2):235–242.

14. Volpi S, Bult CJ, Chisholm RL, Deverka PA, Ginsburg GS, Haidar CE, et al. Research directions in the clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics: an overview of US programs and challenges. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1159

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Bint-e-Kulsoom and Amir Nazir 2025. Physician Readiness for Pharmacogenomics and Genomic-Guided Prescribing: A Cross-Sectional Study at Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Journal of Precision Medicine and Health Research. 2, 2 (Dec. 2025), 1–8.